Archive | Theatre RSS feed for this section

The Elephant and the Whale (Theater Notes)

27 Jun

The circus traveled around the country. Pulling into cities, emptying box cars, putting up tents, taking them down again, and moving on. It wasn’t a big top. In fact it wasn’t even a medium top. It was a very small, small top, a tent that held “all the fun and a quarter of the action.” But after 67 tours, the circus got tired and wondered what was next.

This is not the end of The Night Circus. It is the beginning of “The Elephant and The Whale,” a magical play conceived by Redmoon Theater’s Frank Maugeri with an original story and songs by Seth Bockley with composer Kevin O’Donnell, produced in collaboration with The Chicago Children’s Theatre.

Ella the Elephant has been the star of the small Hoogebeck Family show for years.  When the family sells the circus in 1919 to a Mr. Quigley who likes to think bigly, Ella and the family are in for some unpleasant surprises. Mr. Quigley wants to turn the show into “Under the Sea,” complete with mermaids in salt water tanks. He accidentally brings a baby whale to the Midwest when he imports seawater for his circus. The whale grows bigger and more miserable. Ella grows more discontent. And an unlikely friendship ensues.

This tale about the two largest mammals on earth is created in miniature. A bicycle built for four doubles as a pre-cinematic moving screen that forms a backdrop as the Hoogebeck’s and Ella’s pre-story is told. Once we reach the play’s present day, the actors dance, tumble, and glide across the stage in a glorious combination of physical comedy and dramatic movement.  They move in perfect sync with each other, creating a monumental story on a small stage, telling an epic tale in 60 minutes.

Four actors play all of the parts, holding mechanical wooden masks in front of their faces for some characters, operating puppets for others. The Whale doesn’t speak; a saw played with a violin bow evokes the sound of his whines and tears. It is a sad, mellifluous sound that asks for empathy. Ella is expressed through song, in third person. We learn that she is graceful, dexterous, and loyal.

suitcase set 2True to Redmoon’s reputation, many theatrical tools combine to create the magic–live-action stick puppets operated in suitcase-sized sets that are moved around the stage, acrobatics, hand puppets, masks. When a suitcase is slammed shut, we  feel the constraints of the circus cage and boxcars and how claustrophobic they are for Ella and the Whale. We flinch when the case is closed, not just because of the loud bang, but because we know an animal is inside, yearning to be free.E&W bicycle

Shadow puppets are used to tell the story when it hits the open sea. The sudden change in dimensions and the hilarity of movement convey Ella and the Whale’s dizzying freedom, achieved together. Eventually, they must part–she must live on land, of course, and he in the sea. But their friendship is the truest, most touching one might imagine.

The children we came with were a bit fidgety on their gym mat as they waited for the play to begin. Then they sat, transfixed, moving only to turn and give us a thumbs up and to balance on hands and knees to get a better look. I’ve long wanted to experience Redmoon Theater’s renowned approach to puppetry and pageantry and I was not disappointed. But, I think there is no better review of a play than an eight-year old saying “That was the best play I’ve ever seen.”

Originally in the theater this spring, the play is enjoying a limited run, with free admission, at Chicago Park District venues.

Popcorn + Pasquale

5 Dec

I’ll admit it. I’m a bit afraid of the opera. I want to like it.  I like the music, the pageantry, the concept of it. I love the idea of dressing for the opera. I feel like I’m supposed to like it.

But, I always feel a bit, well, dumb when I think about the opera.  Funny, because my first opera experience–at the Metropolitan Opera in NYC, back in the day before the translations scrolled above the stage–included a pre-performance conversation with a friend’s professor who told us the story (The Magic Flute with Red Buttons of all people, if I remember correctly), prepped us, and accompanied us. And, I loved it.

Flash forward a decade to Chicago, home of the Lyric Opera.  All I really knew about the Lyric was that it may have been the model for the opera house in Orson Welles’s Citizen Kane  and that from the river the building resembles an armchair.

The Civic Opera house, Chicago, Illinois. Phot...

The Civic Opera house, Chicago, Illinois. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Then I met the man who eventually became Culture Husband. He’s educated about music and he loves opera (and Peter Gabriel and Pink Floyd). So, he took me to the Lyric Opera several times. And each time we really enjoyed the performance. But, eventually we settled in to our subscription at Steppenwolf and haunted other live theaters around town. The opera–tickets expensive and hard to come by–fell by the wayside.

So, I was delighted to read about the Lyric Opera’s program Popcorn + Pasquale, a 70-minute program billed as “an opera adventure for children and their parents.”  Culture Husband, Culture Sprout, and I were among the hordes who packed the house for an abridged version of Donizetti’s Don Pasquale.

I had forgotten how beautiful the theatre is. Truly, one of Chicago’s many gems.

Lyric Opera of Chicago, interior view Original...

Lyric Opera of Chicago, interior view Original description: Lyric Opera, Do It Yourself Messiah (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

As the lights went down, one of Don Pasquale’s servants (our Host, actor Ross Lehman, a Chicago legend), came onto the stage and beckoned a young boy to join him. He invited the boy to be a servant in the performance and learn about the opera. Through this device–the Host speaking English to explain the story, the art form, and the theatre to the boy–we were introduced to the characters, the scrolling supertitles, the orchestra, and the conductor.  The Host intervened just enough to set expectations and prep us for the story. Then he sat back and let the opera singers take over.

Don Pasquale lampoons the melodramatic nature of many opera books. In that, it is a great story for kids–it’s not too serious and it is a lot of fun. The boy asked what we were all thinking (such as “Why would she marry Don Pasquale if she’s really in love with his nephew? Don Pasquale is so old…”).  Sitting up in the first balcony, we had a great appreciation for the talent and lungs it takes to project a voice without a microphone. And, we could perceive which voices did it a bit more strongly than others.

I won’t pretend to know enough to critique or review the performance. I will say that as  parent and a wannabe opera lover, I appreciate that the Lyric offers this performance–real opera singers performing a real show with a theatrical device to explain it to newbies.  As a Chicagoan, I was thrilled to see a packed house and to know how many like-minded families (and Boys’ and Girls’ Clubs, and elementary schools, all with big yellow busses in front) were willing to check this out.  It seems like this is a trend in the opera world, along with bringing the Metropolitan Opera live via satellite to a movie theater near you.

Culture Bean and Culture Sprout at the Chicago Lyric Opera. Photo credit: Culture Husband

As for the popcorn–only Don Pasquale had it. He brought it out and threw it at his nephew and at the prompter’s box.  We should have known that popcorn at the opera was too good to be true!

Culture Sprout liked Don Pasquale, but admitted that she’s not ready for a full length opera just yet. Good thing I hadn’t yet purchased the tickets to Hansel and Gretel

Kinky Boots (This isn’t what you think!)

24 Oct

This entry is not about Helmut Newton’s erotic fashion photography. Nor is it about Chuck Kleinhans’s famous lecture , “The Social Semiotics of High Heel Shoe Images.” However, both men–each of whom I am (was) honored to know–deeply informed my experience of Harvey Fierstein and Cyndi Lauper’s delightful new musical, Kinky Boots.

With a book by Harvey Fierstein (Cage aux Folles, Torch Song Trilogy), and full of the sophistication and wit he brings to depictions of partnerships between straight and gay men, music by Cyndi Lauper, who taught my generation to let their “true colors shine through,”  and inspired by a true story that has been tested in a well-received movie, Kinky Boots should have the bones it needs to become a hit.

Simply put, Kinky Boots is about a drag queen who comes to the rescue of a shoe factory and its heir.  The story is heartwarming and hysterical. The music is sometimes moving, sometimes raucous. Some of the choreography and a few of the voices are a bit uneven, but the overall result was a play that sent us into the night humming and dancing.

Kinky Boots does not deliver the sexual frisson that the title might evoke for you. It is not an erotic tale, nor is it a romantic love story. Adapted from the 2005 movie (dir. Julian Jarrold), Kinky Boots reminds us of that particular British working class genre film, epitomized by the films of Mike Leigh–stories about working class English who conquer prejudices as they come together during hard economic times. It is the story of two men who grew up oppressed by expectations created by their fathers and the society around them. When they meet, they soon discover that they can help each other live lives of their own choosing. It’s an unlikely brotherhood, but it works.

Charlie Price (Stark Sands), the shoe factory heir, challenges the path, moving to London to pursue a different career (Mr. Price: “A toast to Charlie, who is going to pursue a career in, um, marketing which I’m told is not a career in shopping.”).  Charlie isn’t pursuing his own dream, exactly. He’s following the lead of Nicola, his fiancée, who wants to leave behind the small town ways of Northampton. He defines his happiness by hers and takes little responsibility for the direction of his own life.

Stark Sands and Billy Porter Kinky Boots at the Bank of America Theater, Chicago. (photo credit: Sean Williams, TimeOut Chicago)

Simon (Billy Porter) is a black boy from a similar working class background who is being raised to be a professional boxer like his father. He dreams, however, of dancing in high-heeled shoes.  As an adult, he throws off his father’s expectations to become Lola, a drag queen.  As Roger Ebert noted in his review of the 2005 movie, Lola is unlike any other drag queen I’ve seen on stage or screen: Lola is “a man pretending to be a woman, and not a woman trapped in a man’s body, and not a parody of a woman, and not a gay man, but a drag queen, period: Lola, a tall, athletic performer in thigh-high red boots who rules the stage of a drag club as if she were born there, and is a pretty good singer, too.” (Ebert, Chicago Sun Times, April 2006). Porter rules the stage as Lola, commanding our attention whether dressed as Lola, with all her bravado and sex, or as Simon, with all his hesitation and fears.

When Charlie’s father dies and he learns that the business is in dire straits, he leaves London to try, at first, to save the business and then to shut down the factory. However, none of the workers—some of whom are his school chums—are willing to leave and one challenges him to change the product. His girlfriend urges him to close the business and come home. Charlie is stuck in the mire of other people’s expectations and he has no ideas.

Along comes Lola.  Their unexpected meeting lands Charlie backstage at a spectacular drag show where Lola leads her Angels in humorous and sophisticated song and dance, all done in 5” heels. He notices that the drag queens are dancing in women’s shoes which just don’t hold up to their male frames. After a while, he realizes that Price & Sons’ expertise  in well-made men’s shoes and Lola’s fabulous sense of style could combine to serve a niche market and save the company.  He has only to convince Lola to join him.

Charlie’s partnership with Lola causes both men to realize that they are not the only ones living in the shadow of their fathers. In lieu of a romantic ballad, Kinky Boots’ most loving song is “I’m Not My Father’s Son,” in which first Lola—as Sam, the biological identity her father recognizes—explains that even with the “strength of Sparta and the patience of Job” she couldn’t mirror what her father saw because that image isn’t in her soul. In this song, Charlie and Lola discover a deep fraternity, which grows into a true love between them and allows both men to flourish.

Sand’s performance is a bit mixed–at times he truly embodies Charlie. Other times, you think that he was second choice after Matthew Morrison (Will Shuester in Glee) turned down the role. Overall, he brings great heart to the role and we root for Charlie and the factory. Annaleigh Ashford (Wicked, Hairspray) delivers a powerful performance as Lauren, stealing the show with her rendition of “Worst Men in History.” She could use a bit of choreography, as could most of the factory workers. Ashford proves that she can open a show and I hope she will take this role to Broadway.

Like most musical comedies, Kinky Boots holds no surprises in its plot twists and ending. You’ll know from the beginning which woman is Charlie’s true soul mate. You’ll guess which factory worker will save the day in an astounding way at the fashion show in Milan. And, you’ll see Charlie and Lola’s change of attitudes coming.  The show isn’t perfect, but the Chicago run is all about polishing it for Broadway. With the right shine, Kinky Boots will go to Broadway and bring the house down.

 

Eastland: A New Musical at the Lookingglass Theatre

15 Jul

On July 24, 1915,  Western Electric employees and their families lined up along to Chicago River to embark on a four-hour cruise to Michigan City. Excitement was high as more than 7,000 people anticipated the fifth annual summer outing.  More than 2,500 revelers boarded The Eastland, one of four cruise ships chartered for the trip. Before they even left the dock. The Eastland capsized and more than 800 people died, trapped by the ship, crushed by shifting furniture, or drowned in twenty feet of water.

More people died in The Eastland accident than perished in the Great Fire of 1903. The ship was recovered and renamed, went on to serve in the military before being decommissioned and destroyed. Along with the lives lost that day are the names of the heroes. Nearly a century later, all that remains is a plaque by the Chicago River, memories passed down by survivors, and a handful of books about the disaster. I’ve lived in Chicago for most of the past 25 years, and I’ve probably walked by that plaque.  I know the city’s history fairly well. And, yet, I, like so many Chicagoans (especially transplants from elsewhere), had never heard of the Eastland disaster, the so-called “Chicago Titanic.”

Lookingglass Theatre’s production Eastland: A New Musical (written by Andrew White) should, by rights, change that.  Winner of the 2011 Best Regional Theatre Tony Award, the Lookinglass Theatre’s current season takes the theme “In Just One Moment, Everything Changed…,” and examines seminal moments in American history. That two of the moments are Chicago tragedies is fitting, given that the ensemble performs in a theater housed in the Water Tower pump building, one of two buildings that survived the Great Fire.

What sets Lookingglass Theatre aside in a city chock full of stupendous repertory and ensemble theater? Its productions come to life with a combination of brilliant acting, music, circus arts, and ingenious stage design. Nothing is as it seems and nothing is predictable.

So it is with Eastland: A New Musical. We know the ending before we walk in. But, we are greeted with a theater draped in silk sails, seated on pews, packed in tightly, and surrounding the stage on three sides. Actors serve double duty as musicians, playing turn-of-the-century instruments such as a banjo, accordion, piano, viola, and guitar. As the first actor strikes the first clear, strong, mournful note, you know you’re in for a treat. The voices are gorgeous and blend beautifully; the music clean and pure.

Eastland doesn’t simply tell the story of the tragedy. It weaves a dreamscape of interrupted lives, imagining the stories of several victims and one survivor (her grandchildren have provided valuable insight to the sources White consulted). White’s Eastland victims are immigrants who have suffered an Atlantic crossing; a young mother in a loveless marriage who has found new love and new hope for a fulfilling life; a young boy whose life is cut so short that he floats through the play as an image in his mother’s mind; working women who wind wire into cable for the newly invented telephone; an undertaker who is stunned by the scale of loss; and a ship’s captain who cannot fathom or shoulder the burden of this loss.

Jeanne T Arrigo, Monica West, and Tiffany Topol winding wire into cable in Eastland at the Lookingglass.

White evokes early 20th century Chicago, teeming with immigrants, grime, and desire. It’s the filthy city that we know from The Jungle, with prohibition and Al Capone, Harold Washington and the Daleys still long in its future. It’s a city where anything is possible, as demonstrated by the 1893 World’s Columbian Exposition. We already love this city, its history, and phoenix that literally grew from its 1871 ashes. We grow to care about these characters–they are Chicagoans, and, thus, they are us. When, inevitably, they slip away from us, we are devastated.

The steamer Eastland being righted after capsi...

The steamer Eastland being righted after capsizing in the Chicago River near the Loop community. Chicago Daily News, Inc., photographer. CREATED/PUBLISHED: August 14 REPRODUCTION NUMBER DN-0064980 REPOSITORY Chicago Historical Society, Clark Street at North Avenue, Chicago, IL 60614-6071. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Most of my favorite visual moments included Reggie Bowles (Doug Hara), the Human Frog, as he dove and swam to pull bodies from the water. “How could I stand by and watch those lives drift away?” he asks. He challenges himself each time he dives to beat Harry Houdini’s underwater record. Behind a scrim, suspended by wires, Bowles swims downward searching for people to help. He sings upside down and swimming. It’s truly breathtaking. Houdini appears to goad him and Bowles carries on a conversation with the Great Houdini as he salvages bodies. When he finally finds a survivor, though, he is all business.  A voice tells him that, like the Eastland, his name will fade quickly from memory, his heroism disappear for the historical record. The real Reggie (pronounced Reggae) was a 17-year old son of a Western Union wire chief who hopped on his bicycle as soon as he heard of the accident, hurried to the site, and volunteered to help. White immortalizes the extraordinary heroism of this ordinary boy, weaving his story into the imagined lives he creates.

What struck me most, aside from the extraordinary voices, the powerful acting, and the lovely verse, was the artistic direction. Using trap doors, scrims and pulleys, the play gives a visceral sense of the listing and leaning of the boat, the struggle of the victims, and the virtuoso rescue efforts of passersby. The first moments of the play don’t hint at the disaster to come–all is anticipation as it might have been that day. When the boat first leans and lists, we wonder along with the characters if it will be alright (even though we know it won’t). And when at the end, they wonder “if they’d missed a sign, a broken mirror or a lost watch,” we wonder with them. Empty, drenched clothing is hoisted on pegs as actors in similar costume are tagged, the dead, and sing their names and stories. These are ghosts, this is a ghost story, and the “extraordinary light” of these ordinary people will shine only in memory.

Andrew White’s words make this play memorable, creating not a memorial, documentary, or reenactment, but a haunting elegy. His words will ring in your ears when you walk out of the theater knowing that, indeed, “only the river remains.”

(My thoughts are not meant as a review. Plenty of seasoned critics have reviewed this lovely play. I’ve attached a few links to their pieces.)

The Stories We Tell: Deported / a dream play by Joyce Van Dyke

26 Mar

We are the stories we tell. Using this title for an anthology of short stories by women writers, Wendy Martin explained in 1990 that she hoped the collection would give voice to the complexity of the female experience.  These narratives, she wrote, attest “to what has been silenced, repressed, and excluded in women’s lives.”  The stories insisted “on the importance of remembering our personal and collective pasts, [drawing] on memories, folk stories, legends, and dreams.”

Joyce Van Dyke. Photo from Deported /a dream play website

Joyce Van Dyke’s “Deported/a dream play” brings to mind Martin’s long out-of-print collection. Van Dyke tells a story often ignored, unknown, or repressed–the story of the Armenian genocide at the hands of the Turks in 1915. It is also her family’s story.

As every reviewer has noted, the play must be understood within the context of history. Briefly noted: In the early years of the twentieth century, the Ottoman Empire repeatedly massacred its Armenian citizens, culminating in 1915 with a genocide that included the mass murder of Armenian men and a forced death march of Armenian women and children. From the play’s website:

“Armenian men were rounded up and killed. The women and children were “deported,” a death march through the desert which few survived. In the summer of 1915, Varter Nazarian and Elmas Sarajian (called “Victoria” in the play) were among those deported with their children from the city of Mezireh in what is now Turkey.   Elmas had three children.  Varter had six, with another born to her on the deportation route.  The two women lost all their children on the deportation.  They eventually reached Aleppo where they remained until 1920.  In 1920 they boarded a ship together, bound for the United States.  In America each woman remarried and had another child.”

Though the play tackles a difficult subject, it is neither grim nor depressing.  “Deported” is, in fact, a story of finding the words to speak the unspeakable. There is both humor and pathos in the journey to these words.

Much as the narrative in Martin’s collection, Van Dyke’s “Deported” uses the telling of the story as an “emancipatory strategy,” both for her characters and her audience. Once freed from the cage of memory, we can all dream and hope for a future free of the hatred and fear that infuses Armenian-Turkish relations nearly a century after the genocide. Thus liberated, the survivors and their children can at last embrace their past as a part of their future. Exquisite, in both the beautiful and the painful senses of the word, “Deported” holds its own among the best of the American repertory theater that I have been privileged to witness. The acting is powerful and the staging elicits the perfect balance of memory and dream state.

From the perspective of her life in Rhode Island in 1938, California in 1978, and a microtopian future sometime around 2045, Victoria  struggles with her memories and eventually finds the words to tell her story. Varter’s ghost, and the memories of other Armenians and few Turks, facilitate Victoria’s journey to a place from which the words can finally flow.

The play opens in 1938. Victoria sits in her attic rehearsing a play and sewing a quilt. The arrival of her husband; a discussion of what their Jewish neighbors have lost in a devastating hurricane; and a radio announcement of Hitler’s progress in Europe trigger Victoria’s memories. She talks to Varter’s ghost of the children she lost–a starving baby put down behind a rock, a three-year old kidnapped at the same moment, his hand dropped “because it takes two hands to put a baby down.”  We sense Varter’s similar grief, but will only come to know her story later. Victoria’s ghosts include dancing villagers who signal the dream or memory sequences; Turks invading the town; an impotent U.S. consul; and husbands marched off to their deaths. Finally, there is the Turkish woman who offers to save the baby and raise it as her own. A neighbor, caught between her friend and her Turkish people, this woman appears many times, a foil to the idea that every Turk turned a blind eye.

Each time Victoria’s mind is taken over by the past we see the story unfold just a bit more.  Varter is always there. Finally, Varter convinces Victoria that she must tell the story to Shoshana, in California in 1978. A beautiful girl, Varter was married at age 14. She quickly bore her beloved husband six children, with a seventh on the way the night he was taken from her. The two women march with their 10 children when the Turks send them away. Victoria arrives in Aleppo with only one child. Varter arrives, later, alone. Over and over, Victoria and Varter lament about the three-year old lost because “it takes two hands to put a baby down,” reminisce about the rose bushes in Varter’s parents’ yard (over the years, Victoria remembers 30 varieties, then 70), and Varter insists that Mr. Nazarian was wearing blue silk pajamas with gold piping the night he was taken away. Details are repeated, with ever-so-slight differences, the memory playing tricks on us as time passes.

The story is devastating. As Victoria weaves her dreams, we grow to understand why she has never told their stories to a living soul, not even her second husband or her American-born daughter. When she is ready to finally speak, she must tell Varter’s story, and even her second husband Larry’s story, in order to finally arrive at her own.  Telling other stories seems to help cut through her own scars to get at the words.

A women’s story, “Deported” recounts an oral history comprised of the memories and truths of an unbearable moment in time. This is a truth that for so long the world has not wanted to hear. Moreover, the play teaches us, it is a story that its survivors have not been able to tell for myriad reasons. Like the quilt that Victoria sews, and the lace that Varter weaves, the story is, however, handed down to each generation, embedded in the very stuff that creates their lives.

One reason for withholding the story is both cultural and linguistic. Varter is told at her wedding that a Christian wife should be “silent and obedient.”  Victoria’s American Armenian husband Harry tells her the same thing at least twice.  Later, Victoria explains to Shoshana, a Jewish researcher collecting Armenian oral histories, that there was no word for “she” or “her” in Armenia.  English had come as a revelation to her, she says. The survivors of the Armenian genocide were largely women.  These female survivors were not able in their own language to tell their stories because, as Victoria seems to explain, they literally didn’t have the language to do so. Moreover, as good wives, they remained “silent and obedient.” Like an atrophying muscle, the more Victoria didn’t tell the story, the more she couldn’t tell the story.

Like many women’s histories (Jung Chang’s memoir Wild Swans: Three Daughters of History  and Silva Malagrino’s film Burnt Oranges come to mind), this is an oral history that ultimately relies on memories suppressed for decades. It weaves a history that joins and effects three generations of women. By the time the stories are told, the truths are immutable, but some of the facts may have shifted. In the microtopian future, when Victoria meets Mr. Nazarian again, he wears pajamas with no gold piping. As he passes, she asks, “Excuse me, Mr. Nazarian, but where is the gold piping on your pyjamas?” “Gold piping?” he responds, “Never had it,” and walks away.

Does the missing gold piping mean that Victoria has misremembered, or mistold, Varter’s story? No. But it does remind us that memory can be unreliable. That truth may not always be equal to fact. That certain details may be irrelevant to the essence of the story. And, finally, the navy blue pyjamas remind us that history belongs to the narrator.

The women’s handiwork, reappearing throughout the play, underscores the importance of women’s roles in the telling of stories and keeping of history: Like oral history, handmade lace and quilts are meant to passed from one generation to the next. They symbolize a passing of traditions and values, keeping their maker alive long after she has passed.  Varter notes that she knots her lace by hand and that the knots can never be undone. This story, told or untold, will always be part of the fabric of Armenian life. Once told, it becomes our responsibility to safeguard it as well.

Varter insists that Victoria name the children she lost on the death march. She does. And, she names Larry’s wife and his two children. Finally, slowly, she is able to name her own lost children. She saves the children by naming them, by ensuring that their memory will continue and will catalyze healing.

It bears noting that Van Dyke acknowledges throughout the play that the Armenian genocide is but one such atrocity that marked the twentieth century. Her grandmother’s story might be the story of a Jewish grandmother in Eastern Europe in the 1940s or a Bosnian Serb in the 1990s. But, the Armenian genocideisthe one the world has yet to acknowledge and to “authorize.” Van Dyke’s characters author it for us and in so doing give to the story an authority that is moving and memorable.

“What is the word for beyond? Beyond forgiving? Beyond forgetting? Beyond imagining? There is no word.” –Victoria in Joyce Van Dyke’s “Deported / a dream play.”

“Deported / a dream play” plays through Sunday, April 1 at Suffolk University’s Modern Theatre in Boston.

 *****

I will admit that I had never heard of this genocide until I married a man who had taught for three months at the American University of Armenia.  Since he first told me the story, we have both noticed that it remains unspoken. There are many reasons for this–political, cultural, economic–none of which I will go into here. I’ve included below several links, suggested by the theatre’s website, to information about the genocide

*****
Full disclosure: my cousin Mark is one of the extraordinary actors who bring this play to life. Bravo, cousin!

Bill T. Jones/Arnie Zane Dance Company’s “Story/Time”

11 Mar
English: Choreographer Bill T. Jones at the Ab...

Image via Wikipedia

Bill T. Jones has been on the dance scene for nearly four decades.  Breaking boundaries for black male dancers, he has lived openly as a gay man, sharing his grief over the death of his partner, and not hiding his HIV status.  His choreography transcends the expected–pairing same sex dancing partners, using full frontal nudity, and expressing the most personal ruminations. He collaborates with digital media artists, filmmakers and musicians, among others.  He has won a MacArthur Foundation “genius” grant; a Tony; several Bessies; and countless other awards. His status as an American original treasure was cemented by the Kennedy Center Honors a few years ago.

His newest piece,”Story/Time,”  blends tropes of storytelling, notions of spatial and temporal boundaries, and movements of modern dance. More than a spoken-word piece, and  more than a dance, the resulting artwork expresses some essential notion of the elements that inspire Mr. Jones.

“Story/Time” begins with Mr. Jones engaging the audience in a conceptual warm-up–each person raises their hand when they believe a minute has passed.  The idea of time and how we perceive its passing swirls through our minds as Mr. Jones takes his seat behind a desk onstage, and a green, digital stopwatch begins a count toward 70 minutes.

Mr. Jones reads stories whose connection to one another range from sharing a cast of characters to puns to the mere fact that he experienced them. Some of the stories are quite funny, others have a simple punch line joke at the end. Still others remind us of the brevity of time, as when Mr. Jones refers to something happening while “Arnie Zane was upstairs dying.” We want to memorize them, remember their lessons. But, even if you see the performance twice, you won’t memorize it: For each performance, 70 stories are chosen by chance from a bank of 150, and they are told in random order.

Meanwhile, the dancers move and swirl. They partner in groups, traditionally with man and woman, or non-traditionally man with man, woman with woman. They circle the stage as a group catching and throwing a member of the troupe. They gyrate and simulate sex acts that look loving and some that look coercive. Their bodies are real in their diverse shapes and colors–willowy, stocky, muscle-bound; black, white, Asian, Latino; male and female. The dancers cover the stage, move to one corner together or spread out each doing their own thing in one corner. Their movements are so beautiful that you wish you could isolate each one for a bit. These, too, are chosen by chance from a “menu” of 35 items.

A musical director creates live music, interrupts the reading with sound effects, and obliterates Jones’ voice with static. Much as a film camera pulls focus to a particular detail in a scene, the musical accompaniment forces the viewer to focus on the dancers or on Jones’ words. Sometimes a word pops out from behind the static only to recede again.

After a few minutes, the bright green stopwatch slips to the corner of your consciousness. You hardly notice when it disappears altogether.

Bill T. Jones and Zane (right) in Rotary Actio...

Image via Wikipedia

Ultimately, the disparate elements blend together into a harmonious expression of the essence this man.  He shares anecdotes about his mother Estela; his deceased but still beloved partner Arnie Zane; his current partner Bjorn; travels with his dance company; impressions of cities he’s visited; and the snippets of awards ceremonies that are not shown on t.v. You don’t need to know the details of Jones’ life to recognize that it has been exceptional–blessed with love and talent, he has worked tirelessly to become the post-modern master of American dance.In the program, Jones’ notes that he was inspired by John Cage’s “Indeterminancy” (1959) in which Cage sat on a stage alone reading a series of one-minute stories. As Lou Fancher has written:

“John Cage, American avant-garde composer and a pivotal figure in the dance world through his collaborations with choreographer Merce Cunningham, is best known for his chance-related compositions. His ambitious unraveling of instrumentation, performance and silence itself has caused a seismic shift for dancemakers, musicians, writers and visual artists from the 1950s to today.”

Jones’ writes that he conceived “Story/Time” such that it would be similar to Cage’s piece, with Jones’ alone on stage in a sort of performance art piece. He quickly realized that the dancers were necessary to how he tells a story. This is Jones’s first performance since retiring from dancing six years ago. In some ways, you feel like the dancers are the ideas inside his head, dancing stories. Coming from the modernist traditions of both Cage and Cunningham, Jones continues in “Story/Time” to converse with his great predecessors.

He tells us that listening, hearing, seeing and feeling are all “germane to this piece,” coaxing us to fall into the words, the dance, the sounds, to absorb it all, to use all of our senses.

Suddenly, the green clock reappears, flashing 65:00 and counting. Oh no, I thought, only five more minutes? I want to sit here and let this wash over me some more.

“There is a saying, you live, you learn, you die, you forget,” Jones repeats, talking of a life lesson his father taught him.  “I have learned,” he continues,” that you live, you learn, you forget, you die.” The crowd chuckles then explodes into applause as the curtain drops. I can’t help but think that Bill T. Jones has written his own elegy with this piece, a marvelous, witty, audacious masterpiece in which he looks back on a life lived knowing that he is in his final act, grateful for every minute he has had. And we are grateful for every minute he has shared with us.

A Read Aloud Memory: Hans Christian Andersen’s “The Snow Queen”

1 Mar

Among my most cherished belongings are a set of leather-bound books that belonged to my mother and her sister. First published in the 1920s, the My  Book House series collects many cherished stories and poems from around the world.  I’m sure my mother read from them often, but the story I most remember is Hans Christian Andersen’s The Snow Queen. Perhaps my memory plays tricks with me, but I recall asking her to read this story again and again.

English: "The Snow Queen"
Image via Wikipedia

The Snow Queen tells of Gerda and Kay, two small children whose apartments under the eaves of their tenements connect via patios. The children love each other very much and play often. As frost creeps across the windows,  Kay’s grandmother tells them of the Snow Queen, the queen of the “white bees,”

she flies where the swarm hangs in the thickest clusters. She is the largest of all; and she can never remain quietly on the earth, but goes up again into the black clouds. Many a winter’s night she flies through the streets of the town, and peeps in at the windows; and they then freeze in so wondrous a manner that they look like flowers.

That night, Gerda dreams of the Snow Queen, watching a flake from the snow storm grow larger until

at last it was like a young lady, dressed in the finest white gauze, made of a million little flakes like stars. She was so beautiful and delicate, but she was of ice, of dazzling, sparkling ice; yet she lived; her eyes gazed fixedly, like two stars; but there was neither quiet nor repose in them. She nodded towards the window, and beckoned with her hand. The little boy was frightened, and jumped down from the chair; it seemed to him as if, at the same moment, a large bird flew past the window.

Unbeknownst to the children the Snow Queen is not just a tale. And, a malicious sprite has stolen the Snow Queen’s mirror and accidentally let it fall to earth. The magic of the mirror is that the Snow Queen’s reflection is young and beautiful despite the reality of her age and ugliness. It allows her to live alone happily in her remote ice castle.

When the mirror’s splinters lodge in humans, however, they create the perception that all that is lovely is hideous, all that is warm is cold: In other words, the splinters kill humanity and compassion.  Splinters lodge in Gerda’s heart and eye, turning him from a lovely boy into a cruel, heartless, and reckless child who abandons his friend, breaking her heart.

The Snow Queen searches the world to collect all the splinters of her mirror so she can restore it. Gerda has the last two pieces and she lures him back to her ice palace where she intends to have him solve the mirror puzzle and then to freeze him and get the last two pieces.

The rest of the story tells of Kay’s determined quest to find and save her friend. She travels many miles (barefoot), escapes enchantment, and even teaches compassion to a wild child. It is a magical tale, full of danger and hope, where love eventually triumphs.

————————————————–

I’m not sure what drew me to the story as a child, but I couldn’t wait to read it to Culture Sprout from the My Book House edition.  I wanted, I think, to create for her a read aloud moment that matched my own. Or, perhaps, to recreate my own.

She liked it, but to my dismay she didn’t gravitate to it like I did.  Her questing girl heroes traverse Oz.  In thinking about that, I began to realize how dark H.C. Andersen’s tale really is; and how light-yet-moralistic L. Frank Baum’s tomes are.

Then we took Culture Sprout to see a stage adaptation of The Snow Queen by the incomparable American Repertory Theatre in Cambridge. In seeing the story play out (gorgeously) in front of me, I realized just how very dark one might find The Snow Queen. 

Think of the story this way: A strange woman comes to town and lures a young boy to her castle far away where she keeps him imprisoned and intends to kill him. His equally young friend strikes out alone, traveling miles and miles  to find and save him. She is trapped by a witch who wants to keep her forever (she escapes) and by a wild girl who wants to keep her as a pet (she talks her way out of it). Don’t worry. There’s a happy endng.

The A.R.T. production combined music, puppetry, and unrivaled creativity to bring the magic of the tale to the stage. The children (and parents) in our party were riveted. I don’t think any of us thought about the darkness while we were watching the play. But afterword, walking to lunch, we did talk a bit about how fairy tales are cautionary stories, teaching children about the dangers in the world without inciting panic or condescending. The little girls ignored us, twirling their roses and dreaming of snow. Andersen’s tale is timeless and I’m hoping that the A.R.T. production will become an annual treat.

H.C. Andersen’s The Snow Queen still ranks as one of my favorite read alouds, from my childhood and today. Maybe Culture Sprout will let me read it to her again!

Read about World Read Aloud Day and please share a read aloud moment of your own!

(Text in italics quoted from Hans Christian Andersen’s The Snow Queen.)